banner



Home  ›  What Are Elements Of Creation In Genesis That Changed Aftet The Fall

What Are Elements Of Creation In Genesis That Changed Aftet The Fall

Written By Sunday, June 5, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Cosmos myth of both Judaism and Christianity

The Genesis creation narrative is the creation myth[a] of both Judaism and Christianity.[1] The narrative is fabricated up of two stories, roughly equivalent to the first two chapters of the Book of Genesis. In the first, Elohim (the Hebrew generic word for God) creates the heavens and the Earth in six days, then rests on, blesses and sanctifies the seventh (i.e. the Biblical Sabbath). In the 2nd story, God, at present referred to by the personal proper noun Yahweh, creates Adam, the first man, from dust and places him in the Garden of Eden, where he is given dominion over the animals. Eve, the starting time woman, is created from Adam equally his companion.

It expounds themes parallel to those in Mesopotamian mythology, emphasizing the Israelite people'southward conventionalities in one God.[2] The first major comprehensive draft of the Pentateuch (the serial of 5 books which begins with Genesis and ends with Deuteronomy) was composed in the late 7th or the sixth century BCE (the Jahwist source) and was subsequently expanded by other authors (the Priestly source) into a work very like Genesis equally known today.[3] The 2 sources can be identified in the cosmos narrative: Priestly and Jahwistic.[iv] The combined narrative is a critique of the Mesopotamian theology of creation: Genesis affirms monotheism and denies polytheism.[5] Robert Change described the combined narrative as "compelling in its archetypal character, its adaptation of myth to monotheistic ends".[6]

The scholar Bruce Waltke cautions against the "woodenly literal" reading of the outset ii chapters of Genesis which leads to "creation scientific discipline" and to such "implausible interpretations" as the "gap theory", the presumption of a "young globe", and the deprival of development.[7] Scholarly writings frequently refer to Genesis as myth, for while the author of Genesis 1–xi "demythologised" his narrative past removing the Babylonian myths those elements which did not fit with his own religion, information technology remains a myth in the sense of being a story of origins.[8]

Limerick [edit]

Sources [edit]

Although tradition attributes Genesis to Moses, biblical scholars hold that it, together with the following four books (making up what Jews phone call the Torah and biblical scholars call the Pentateuch), is "a composite work, the product of many hands and periods."[9] A common hypothesis amid biblical scholars today is that the first major comprehensive draft of the Pentateuch was equanimous in the tardily 7th or the 6th century BCE (the Jahwist source), and that this was afterwards expanded by the improver of diverse narratives and laws (the Priestly source) into a work very like the 1 existing today.[3]

As for the historical background which led to the creation of the narrative itself, a theory which has gained considerable interest, although yet controversial, is "Western farsi imperial authorisation". This proposes that the Persians, subsequently their conquest of Babylon in 538 BCE, agreed to grant Jerusalem a big measure of local autonomy within the empire, merely required the local regime to produce a unmarried police force lawmaking accepted by the entire customs. It further proposes that there were 2 powerful groups in the community – the priestly families who controlled the Temple, and the landowning families who made up the "elders" – and that these two groups were in conflict over many issues, and that each had its own "history of origins", but the Western farsi promise of greatly increased local autonomy for all provided a powerful incentive to cooperate in producing a single text.[ten]

Structure [edit]

The creation narrative is made up of two stories, roughly equivalent to the ii showtime chapters of the Book of Genesis[xi] (in that location are no affiliate divisions in the original Hebrew text; see Chapters and verses of the Bible). The first business relationship (Genesis 1:one–2:3) employs a repetitious structure of divine fiat and fulfillment, then the statement "And there was evening and at that place was forenoon, the [x thursday] day," for each of the six days of creation. In each of the first three days in that location is an act of partition: day 1 divides the darkness from light, day two the "waters above" from the "waters beneath", and day three the sea from the land. In each of the next three days these divisions are populated: day four populates the darkness and light with Lord's day, Moon and stars; 24-hour interval v populates seas and skies with fish and fowl; and finally land-based creatures and mankind populate the land.[12]

Consistency was evidently not seen every bit essential to storytelling in aboriginal Near Eastern literature.[13] The overlapping stories of Genesis 1 and 2 are contradictory but likewise complementary, with the kickoff (the Priestly story) concerned with the creation of the unabridged cosmos while the second (the Yahwist story) focuses on man as moral agent and cultivator of his surroundings.[11] The highly regimented 7-24-hour interval narrative of Genesis i features an omnipotent God who creates a god-like humanity, while the one-day cosmos of Genesis 2 uses a simple linear narrative, a God who can fail as well equally succeed, and a humanity which is not god-like but is punished for acts which would lead to their becoming god-like.[14] Even the guild and method of creation differs.[14] "Together, this combination of parallel character and contrasting profile point to the dissimilar origin of materials in Genesis ane and Genesis 2, notwithstanding elegantly they have now been combined."[15]

The primary accounts in each chapter are joined by a literary bridge at Genesis 2:four, "These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created." This echoes the first line of Genesis ane, "In the starting time God created the heaven and the world", and is reversed in the side by side phrase, "...in the day that the LORD God fabricated the globe and the heavens". This poetry is one of 10 "generations" (Hebrew: תולדות toledot ) phrases used throughout Genesis, which provide a literary structure to the book.[sixteen] They normally function as headings to what comes afterward, but the position of this, the first of the series, has been the subject of much argue.[17]

Mesopotamian influence [edit]

Comparative mythology provides historical and cross-cultural perspectives for Jewish mythology. Both sources behind the Genesis creation narrative borrowed themes from Mesopotamian mythology,[eighteen] [nineteen] merely adapted them to their conventionalities in one God,[ii] establishing a monotheistic cosmos in opposition to the polytheistic creation myth of ancient Israel's neighbors.[20] [21]

Genesis 1–11 equally a whole is imbued with Mesopotamian myths.[xviii] [22] Genesis i bears both striking differences from and striking similarities to Babylon'due south national creation myth, the Enuma Elish.[19] On the side of similarities, both begin from a stage of chaotic waters before annihilation is created, in both a stock-still dome-shaped "firmament" divides these waters from the habitable Earth, and both conclude with the creation of a human called "homo" and the building of a temple for the god (in Genesis 1, this temple is the entire cosmos).[23] On the side of contrasts, Genesis 1 is monotheistic; information technology makes no endeavour to account for the origins of God, and there is no trace of the resistance to the reduction of chaos to order (Greek: theomachy, lit. "God-fighting"), all of which mark the Mesopotamian creation accounts.[ii] Still, Genesis 1 bears similarities to the Baal Cycle of Israel'due south neighbor, Ugarit.[24]

The Enuma Elish has also left traces on Genesis two. Both begin with a series of statements of what did non exist at the moment when creation began; the Enuma Elish has a spring (in the bounding main) as the point where creation begins, paralleling the spring (on the land – Genesis 2 is notable for being a "dry" cosmos story) in Genesis 2:half-dozen that "watered the whole face of the ground"; in both myths, Yahweh/the gods first create a homo to serve him/them, then animals and vegetation. At the same fourth dimension, and as with Genesis ane, the Jewish version has drastically inverse its Babylonian model: Eve, for example, seems to fill up the role of a mother goddess when, in Genesis 4:1, she says that she has "created a human with Yahweh", but she is not a divine being like her Babylonian counterpart.[25]

Genesis two has shut parallels with a second Mesopotamian myth, the Atra-Hasis epic – parallels that in fact extend throughout Genesis 2–eleven, from the Creation to the Alluvion and its aftermath. The two share numerous plot-details (east.m. the divine garden and the function of the first man in the garden, the creation of the man from a mixture of earth and divine substance, the chance of immortality, etc.), and have a similar overall theme: the gradual clarification of man's relationship with God(s) and animals.[26]

Creation by give-and-take and creation by gainsay [edit]

The narratives in Genesis ane and ii were not the only creation myths in ancient Israel, and the complete biblical evidence suggests two contrasting models.[27] The showtime is the "logos" (meaning speech) model, where a supreme God "speaks" dormant matter into existence. The 2d is the "agon" (meaning struggle or gainsay) model, in which it is God's victory in battle over the monsters of the ocean that mark his sovereignty and might.[28] Genesis i is an case of creation by speech, while Psalm 74 and Isaiah 51 are examples of the "agon" mythology, recalling a Canaanite myth in which God creates the earth by vanquishing the water deities: "Awake, awake! ... Information technology was you that hacked Rahab in pieces, that pierced the Dragon! It was y'all that dried upward the Sea, the waters of the corking Deep, that made the abysses of the Sea a route that the redeemed might walk..."[29]

First narrative: Genesis 1:1–2:3 [edit]

Background [edit]

The cosmos created in Genesis 1 bears a striking resemblance to the Tabernacle in Exodus 35–xl, which was the paradigm of the Temple in Jerusalem and the focus of priestly worship of Yahweh; for this reason, and because other Eye Eastern cosmos stories also climax with the structure of a temple/house for the creator-god, Genesis 1 can be interpreted every bit a description of the construction of the cosmos as God'due south house, for which the Temple in Jerusalem served as the earthly representative.[30]

The word bara is translated as "created" in English, but the concept information technology embodied was not the aforementioned as the modern term: in the globe of the aboriginal Almost East, the gods demonstrated their power over the earth not by creating affair simply by fixing destinies, so that the essence of the bara which God performs in Genesis concerns bringing "heaven and earth" (a fix phrase meaning "everything") into existence by organising and assigning roles and functions.[31]

The use of numbers in ancient texts was often numerological rather than factual – that is, the numbers were used considering they held some symbolic value to the author.[32] The number vii, cogent divine completion, permeates Genesis i: verse ane:ane consists of vii words, verse one:2 of fourteen, and 2:1–3 has 35 words (5×7); Elohim is mentioned 35 times, "heaven/firmament" and "world" 21 times each, and the phrases "and it was so" and "God saw that information technology was good" occur 7 times each.[33]

Amid commentators, symbolic interpretation of the numbers may coexist with factual interpretations.[34] Numerologically meaning patterns of repeated words and phrases are termed "Hebraic meter". They begin in the cosmos narrative and go on through the book of Genesis.[34]

Pre-creation: Genesis ane:1–2 [edit]

1 In the showtime God created the sky and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the confront of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.[35]

Although the opening phrase of Genesis i:1 is normally translated in English language as above, the Hebrew is cryptic, and tin be translated at least three means:

  1. as a argument that the cosmos had an absolute beginning ("In the kickoff God created the heaven and the earth.");
  2. as a argument describing the condition of the world when God began creating ("When in the beginning God created the heavens and the world, the earth was untamed and shapeless."); and
  3. essentially similar to the 2d version merely taking all of Genesis 1:ii as groundwork information ("When in the commencement God created the heavens and the earth – the globe being untamed and shapeless... – God said, Let there be low-cal!").[36]

The 2nd seems to exist the meaning intended past the original Priestly author: the verb bara is used only of God (people practise not engage in bara), and it concerns the assignment of roles, as in the creation of the first people as "male and female person" (i.due east., it allocates them sexes): in other words, the ability of God is existence shown not by the creation of matter but by the fixing of destinies.[31]

The heavens and the earth is a set phrase pregnant "everything", i.eastward., the creation. This was fabricated up of three levels, the habitable earth in the eye, the heavens above, and an underworld beneath, all surrounded by a watery "bounding main" of chaos as the Babylonian Tiamat.[37] The Earth itself was a flat disc, surrounded by mountains or sea. To a higher place it was the firmament, a transparent merely solid dome resting on the mountains, allowing men to see the blue of the waters in a higher place, with "windows" to allow the pelting to enter, and containing the Sun, Moon and stars. The waters extended below the Earth, which rested on pillars sunk in the waters, and in the underworld was Sheol, the abode of the dead.[38]

The opening of Genesis 1 continues: "And the earth was formless and void..." The phrase "formless and void" is a translation of the Hebrew tohu wa-bohu , (Hebrew: תֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ), chaos, the status that bara, ordering, remedies.[39] Tohu by itself means "emptiness, futility"; information technology is used to describe the desert wilderness; bohu has no known pregnant and was apparently coined to rhyme with and reinforce tohu.[forty] The phrase appears too in Jeremiah iv:23 where the prophet warns Israel that rebellion against God will lead to the return of darkness and anarchy, "as if the earth had been 'uncreated'".[41]

The opening of Genesis 1 concludes with a statement that "darkness was on the face of the deep" (Hebrew: תְהוֹם tehôm ), [the] "darkness" and the "deep" existence two of the three elements of the chaos represented in tohu wa-bohu (the third is the "formless globe"). In the Enuma Elish, the "deep" is personified as the goddess Tiamat, the enemy of Marduk;[39] hither it is the formless torso of primeval h2o surrounding the habitable globe, afterwards to be released during the Deluge, when "all the fountains of the great deep burst along" from the waters beneath the earth and from the "windows" of the heaven.[42]

The ruach of God moves over the face of the deep before creation begins. Ruach ( רוּחַ ) has the meanings "wind, spirit, breath", and elohim can mean "great" equally well every bit "god": the ruach elohim may therefore hateful the "wind/breath of God" (the storm-current of air is God'due south breath in Psalms eighteen:16 and elsewhere, and the wind of God returns in the Flood story equally the means by which God restores the Globe), or God's "spirit", a concept which is somewhat vague in the Hebrew Bible, or information technology may only signify a great tempest-wind.[43]

Six days of Creation: Genesis i:3–2:3 [edit]

God'south starting time act was the creation of undifferentiated light; dark and calorie-free were then separated into night and twenty-four hours, their order (evening before morning) signifying that this was the liturgical solar day; then the Lord's day, Moon and stars were created to marking the proper times for the festivals of the week and year. Simply when this is done does God create man and adult female and the ways to sustain them (plants and animals). At the stop of the sixth solar day, when creation is complete, the world is a cosmic temple in which the function of humanity is the worship of God. This parallels Mesopotamian myth (the Enuma Elish) and as well echoes chapter 38 of the Book of Chore, where God recalls how the stars, the "sons of God", sang when the corner-rock of cosmos was laid.[44]

First mean solar day [edit]

3 And God said: 'Let in that location be light.' And in that location was light. 4 And God saw the lite, that it was proficient; and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God called the low-cal Day, and the darkness He called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, one solar day.[45]

Day 1 begins with the cosmos of lite. God creates by spoken control and names the elements of the globe as he creates them. In the aboriginal Near Due east the act of naming was jump upwards with the act of creating: thus in Egyptian literature the creator god pronounced the names of everything, and the Enûma Elish begins at the point where nothing has yet been named.[46] God'due south creation by speech also suggests that he is being compared to a male monarch, who has just to speak for things to happen.[47]

Second day [edit]

6 And God said: 'Permit there be a empyrean in the midst of the waters, and permit it divide the waters from the waters.' 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were higher up the firmament; and information technology was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And at that place was evening and at that place was morning, a 2nd twenty-four hours.[48]

Rāqîa, the word translated as empyrean, is from rāqa', the verb used for the act of chirapsia metallic into sparse plates.[49] Created on the second day of creation and populated by luminaries on the quaternary, it is a solid dome which separates the Earth below from the heavens and their waters above, as in Egyptian and Mesopotamian conventionalities of the aforementioned time.[50] In Genesis 1:17 the stars are set in the raqia'; in Babylonian myth the heavens were made of diverse precious stones (compare Exodus 24:10 where the elders of Israel run across God on the sapphire floor of heaven), with the stars engraved in their surface.[51]

Third day [edit]

And God said: 'Let the waters nether the sky be gathered together unto i place, and let the dry land appear.' And it was so. ten And God called the dry land Earth, and the gathering together of the waters called He Seas; and God saw that it was good. 11 And God said: 'Permit the earth put forth grass, herb yielding seed, and fruit-tree bearing fruit after its kind, wherein is the seed thereof, upon the earth.' And it was then. 12 And the earth brought forth grass, herb yielding seed after its kind, and tree bearing fruit, wherein is the seed thereof, after its kind; and God saw that it was adept. xiii And there was evening and at that place was morning, a tertiary day.[52]

On the third day, the waters withdraw, creating a ring of ocean surrounding a single round continent.[53] By the terminate of the third day God has created a foundational surroundings of light, heavens, seas and earth.[54] The three levels of the cosmos are next populated in the same gild in which they were created – heavens, sea, earth.

God does non create or make trees and plants, but instead commands the earth to produce them. The underlying theological meaning seems to exist that God has given the previously arid earth the ability to produce vegetation, and it at present does so at his control. "Co-ordinate to (one's) kind" appears to look forward to the laws constitute later in the Pentateuch, which lay great stress on holiness through separation.[55]

4th day [edit]

fourteen And God said: 'Let there be lights in the empyrean of the sky to divide the twenty-four hour period from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years; xv and let them be for lights in the empyrean of the heaven to give light upon the earth.' And it was so. 16 And God made the two cracking lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the bottom light to rule the nighttime; and the stars. 17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to requite low-cal upon the world, 18 and to dominion over the day and over the dark, and to separate the low-cal from the darkness; and God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening and there was morning, a 4th twenty-four hour period.[56]

On Solar day Four the language of "ruling" is introduced: the heavenly bodies volition "govern" day and night and mark seasons and years and days (a thing of crucial importance to the Priestly authors, as the three pilgrimage festivals were organised around the cycles of both the Dominicus and Moon, in a lunisolar agenda that could have either 12 or xiii months.);[57] afterward, homo will be created to rule over the whole of creation every bit God's regent. God puts "lights" in the firmament to "rule over" the day and the night.[58] Specifically, God creates the "greater light," the "lesser light," and the stars. According to Victor Hamilton, most scholars concord that the choice of "greater calorie-free" and "bottom light", rather than the more explicit "Sun" and "Moon", is anti-mythological rhetoric intended to contradict widespread contemporary behavior that the Sun and the Moon were deities themselves.[59]

5th day [edit]

And God said: 'Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures, and let fowl fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.' 21 And God created the nifty body of water-monsters, and every living creature that creepeth, wherewith the waters swarmed, later its kind, and every winged fowl subsequently its kind; and God saw that it was good. 22 And God blest them, proverb: 'Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.' 23 And at that place was evening and there was morning, a fifth 24-hour interval.[threescore]

In the Egyptian and Mesopotamian mythologies, the creator-god has to do battle with the sea-monsters before he can make sky and earth; in Genesis 1:21, the word tannin, sometimes translated as "sea monsters" or "groovy creatures", parallels the named chaos-monsters Rahab and Leviathan from Psalm 74:13, and Isaiah 27:ane, and Isaiah 51:9, just there is no hint (in Genesis) of gainsay, and the tannin are simply creatures created by God.[61]

6th day [edit]

The Creation of the Animals (1506–1511), by Grão Vasco

24 And God said: 'Let the earth bring forth the living beast after its kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the globe afterwards its kind.' And it was so. 25 And God made the beast of the earth after its kind, and the cattle later their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the ground after its kind; and God saw that it was good.

26 And God said: 'Permit united states of america make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them take dominion over the fish of the bounding main, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping affair that creepeth upon the earth.' 27 And God created man in His own image, in the paradigm of God created He him; male and female person created He them. 28 And God blessed them; and God said unto them: 'Be fruitful, and multiply, and furnish the earth, and subdue it; and accept rule over the fish of the bounding main, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that creepeth upon the earth.' 29 And God said: 'Behold, I take given you every herb yielding seed, which is upon the face of all the globe, and every tree, in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed--to you it shall exist for nutrient; 30 and to every brute of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the world, wherein there is a living soul, [I take given] every green herb for food.' And it was and so.31 And God saw every matter that He had made, and, behold, it was very good. And there was evening and at that place was morning, the sixth mean solar day.[62]

When in Genesis one:26 God says "Allow the states make man", the Hebrew word used is adam; in this form information technology is a generic noun, "flesh", and does non imply that this creation is male person. After this first mention the discussion always appears equally ha-adam, "the man", but as Genesis 1:27 shows ("So God created human being in his [own] paradigm, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."), the give-and-take is still not exclusively male person.[63]

Man was created in the "image of God". The significant of this is unclear: suggestions include:

  1. Having the spiritual qualities of God such as intellect, volition, etc.;
  2. Having the physical form of God;
  3. A combination of these two;
  4. Being God's counterpart on Earth and able to enter into a human relationship with him;
  5. Beingness God's representative or viceroy on Globe.[64]

The fact that God says "Allow us make homo..." has given rise to several theories, of which the two virtually important are that "us" is purple plural,[65] or that it reflects a setting in a divine quango with God enthroned every bit rex and proposing the cosmos of flesh to the lesser divine beings.[66]

God tells the animals and humans that he has given them "the dark-green plants for food" – creation is to be vegetarian. Simply after, after the Alluvion, is human given permission to eat mankind. The Priestly author of Genesis appears to look back to an platonic by in which mankind lived at peace both with itself and with the animal kingdom, and which could be re-accomplished through a proper sacrificial life in harmony with God.[67]

Upon completion, God sees that "every thing that He had made ... was very expert" (Genesis 1:31). This implies that the materials that existed before the Creation ("tohu wa-bohu," "darkness," "tehom") were not "very good." State of israel Knohl hypothesized that the Priestly source gear up this dichotomy to mitigate the problem of evil.[68]

Seventh day: divine residue [edit]

And the heaven and the world were finished, and all the host of them. ii And on the seventh twenty-four hours God finished His piece of work which He had made; and He rested on the 7th twenty-four hours from all His work which He had made. iii And God blest the seventh solar day, and hallowed it; considering that in it He rested from all His work which God in creating had made.[69]

Cosmos is followed by rest. In ancient Near Eastern literature the divine rest is accomplished in a temple as a result of having brought order to chaos. Rest is both detachment, as the piece of work of creation is finished, just also engagement, as the deity is now nowadays in his temple to maintain a secure and ordered cosmos.[70] Compare with Exodus 20:eight–20:11: "Retrieve the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt k labour, and do all thy piece of work; but the seventh day is a sabbath unto the LORD thy GOD, in it thou shalt not practice any way of work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy man-servant, nor thy maid-retainer, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; for in 6 days the LORD made heaven and earth, the bounding main, and all that in them is, and rested on the seventh day; wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath 24-hour interval, and hallowed information technology."

2nd narrative: Genesis 2:4–2:25 [edit]

Genesis 2–3, the Garden of Eden story, was probably authored around 500 BCE as "a soapbox on ideals in life, the danger in human being glory, and the fundamentally cryptic nature of humanity – especially human mental faculties".[71] The Garden in which the action takes identify lies on the mythological border between the human and the divine worlds, probably on the far side of the cosmic ocean well-nigh the rim of the earth; following a conventional ancient Near Eastern concept, the Eden river first forms that bounding main and then divides into four rivers which run from the four corners of the earth towards its centre.[71] Information technology opens "in the day that the LORD God made the world and the heavens", a set introduction similar to those found in Babylonian myths.[72] Before the homo is created the earth is a arid waste watered by an 'êḏ (אד‎); Genesis 2:half dozen the Male monarch James Version translated this as "mist", post-obit Jewish practice, but since the mid-20th century Hebraists accept generally accepted that the real meaning is "bound of hush-hush h2o".[73]

In Genesis 1 the feature word for God's activity is bara, "created"; in Genesis 2 the word used when he creates the human is yatsar (ייצר‎ yîṣer), significant "fashioned", a discussion used in contexts such as a potter fashioning a pot from clay.[74] God breathes his own breath into the clay and it becomes nephesh (נֶ֫פֶשׁ‎), a word pregnant "life", "vitality", "the living personality"; man shares nephesh with all creatures, merely the text describes this life-giving act by God only in relation to homo.[75]

Eden, where God puts his Garden of Eden, comes from a root meaning "fertility": the get-go human being is to work in God's miraculously fertile garden.[76] The "tree of life" is a motif from Mesopotamian myth: in the Epic of Gilgamesh (c. 1800 BCE) the hero is given a plant whose proper noun is "man becomes immature in old historic period", just a serpent steals the plant from him.[77] [78] There has been much scholarly discussion about the type of cognition given by the second tree. Suggestions include: human qualities, sexual consciousness, ethical knowledge, or universal knowledge; with the final being the most widely accepted.[79] In Eden, mankind has a choice between wisdom and life, and chooses the showtime, although God intended them for the 2nd.[80]

The mythic Eden and its rivers may represent the real Jerusalem, the Temple and the Promised Country. Eden may represent the divine garden on Zion, the mountain of God, which was also Jerusalem; while the real Gihon was a spring outside the city (mirroring the spring which waters Eden); and the imagery of the Garden, with its serpent and cherubs, has been seen equally a reflection of the real images of the Solomonic Temple with its copper serpent (the nehushtan) and guardian cherubs.[81] Genesis ii is the but place in the Bible where Eden appears as a geographic location: elsewhere (notably in the Book of Ezekiel) information technology is a mythological place located on the holy Mount of God, with echoes of a Mesopotamian myth of the king every bit a primordial man placed in a divine garden to guard the tree of life.[82]

"Good and evil" is a merism, in this instance significant only "everything", only it may also have a moral connotation. When God forbids the human to eat from the tree of knowledge he says that if he does so he is "doomed to die": the Hebrew backside this is in the grade used in the Bible for issuing death sentences.[83]

The first woman is created out of 1 of Adam'due south ribs to be ezer kenegdo (עזר כנגדו‎ 'êzer kəneḡdō)[84] – a term notably difficult to translate – to the human being. Kəneḡdō means "aslope, opposite, a counterpart to him", and 'êzer means active intervention on behalf of the other person.[85] God's naming of the elements of the cosmos in Genesis i illustrated his authority over cosmos; now the human'southward naming of the animals (and of Woman) illustrates Adam'south authorization within creation.[86]

The woman is chosen ishah (אשה‎ 'iš-šāh), "Adult female", with an explanation that this is considering she was taken from ish (אִישׁ‎ 'îš), pregnant "man";[84] the two words are not in fact connected.[ commendation needed ] Afterwards, later on the story of the Garden is complete, she receives a name: Ḥawwāh (חוה ‎, Eve). This means "living" in Hebrew, from a root that tin can also mean "snake".[87] Assyriologist Samuel Noah Kramer connects Eve's creation to the ancient Sumerian myth of Enki, who was healed by the goddess Nin-ti, "the Lady of the rib"; this became "the Lady who makes alive" via a pun on the give-and-take ti , which means both "rib" and "to make live" in Sumerian.[88] The Hebrew word traditionally translated "rib" in English tin also hateful "side", "bedchamber", or "beam".[89] A long-continuing exegetical tradition holds that the employ of a rib from man's side emphasizes that both human and woman accept equal dignity, for woman was created from the same cloth equally man, shaped and given life by the same processes.[90]

Creationism and the genre of the creation narrative [edit]

The meaning to be derived from the Genesis creation narrative will depend on the reader's understanding of its genre, the literary "type" to which it belongs (e.g., scientific cosmology, creation myth, or historical saga).[91] According to Biblical scholar Francis Andersen, misunderstanding the genre of the text—significant the intention of the writer(s) and the culture within which they wrote—volition effect in a misreading.[92] Reformed evangelical scholar Bruce Waltke cautions against one such misreading: the "woodenly literal" arroyo, which leads to "creation science", but also to such "implausible interpretations" as the "gap theory", the presumption of a "young earth", and the denial of evolution.[seven] As scholar of Jewish studies, Jon D. Levenson, puts it:

How much history lies behind the story of Genesis? Because the activity of the earliest story is not represented equally taking place on the airplane of ordinary human being history and has so many affinities with aboriginal mythology, it is very far-fetched to speak of its narratives as historical at all."[93]

Another scholar, Conrad Hyers, summed upwardly the same idea by writing, "A literalist interpretation of the Genesis accounts is inappropriate, misleading, and unworkable [because] it presupposes and insists upon a kind of literature and intention that is non there."[94]

Whatever else it may be, Genesis i is "story", since it features character and characterization, a narrator, and dramatic tension expressed through a series of incidents arranged in time.[95] The Priestly author of Genesis one had to confront ii major difficulties. First, at that place is the fact that since only God exists at this point, no-one was available to be the narrator; the storyteller solved this by introducing an unobtrusive "third person narrator".[96] 2nd, in that location was the trouble of conflict: conflict is necessary to agitate the reader'south involvement in the story, still with nothing else existing, neither a chaos-monster nor another god, there cannot exist any disharmonize. This was solved by creating a very minimal tension: God is opposed by nothingness itself, the blank of the globe "without grade and void."[96] Telling the story in this way was a deliberate choice: there are a number of creation stories in the Bible, simply they tend to be told in the first person, by Wisdom, the instrument past which God created the globe; the choice of an all-seeing third-person narrator in the Genesis narrative allows the storyteller to create the impression that everything is being told and nothing held dorsum.[97]

One tin also regard Genesis as "historylike", "part of a broader spectrum of originally bearding, history-like aboriginal Near Eastern narratives."[98] Scholarly writings oftentimes refer to Genesis as myth, but there is no agreement on how to define "myth", and so while Brevard Childs famously suggested that the author of Genesis 1–11 "demythologised" his narrative, meaning that he removed from his sources (the Babylonian myths) those elements which did not fit with his own faith, others can say it is entirely mythical.[8]

Genesis 1–2 reflects ancient ideas about science: in the words of Eastward.A. Speiser, "on the subject of cosmos biblical tradition aligned itself with the traditional tenets of Babylonian scientific discipline."[99] The opening words of Genesis 1, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth", sum up the author(south) belief that Yahweh, the god of Israel, was solely responsible for creation and had no rivals.[100] Subsequently Jewish thinkers, adopting ideas from Greek philosophy, concluded that God's Wisdom, Word and Spirit penetrated all things and gave them unity.[101] Christianity in plow adopted these ideas and identified Jesus with the creative word: "In the outset was the Give-and-take, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1).[102] When the Jews came into contact with Greek idea, there followed a major reinterpretation of the underlying cosmology of the Genesis narrative. The biblical authors conceived the cosmos as a apartment disc-shaped Earth in the centre, an underworld for the dead below, and heaven higher up.[103] Below the Earth were the "waters of chaos", the catholic ocean, home to mythic monsters defeated and slain by God; in Exodus 20:4, God warns confronting making an image "of anything that is in the waters under the earth".[100] In that location were as well waters higher up the World, and then the raqia (firmament), a solid bowl, was necessary to keep them from flooding the globe.[104] During the Hellenistic menstruum this was largely replaced by a more than "scientific" model as imagined by Greek philosophers, according to which the Earth was a sphere at the eye of concentric shells of celestial spheres containing the Sun, Moon, stars and planets.[103]

The idea that God created the globe out of nothing (creatio ex nihilo) has get central today to Islam, Christianity, and Judaism – indeed, the medieval Jewish philosopher Maimonides felt information technology was the only concept that the iii religions shared[105] – yet information technology is not found directly in Genesis, nor in the entire Hebrew Bible.[106] The Priestly authors of Genesis 1 were concerned not with the origins of matter (the textile which God formed into the habitable cosmos), but with assigning roles so that the Creation should function.[31] This was all the same the situation in the early 2nd century Ad, although early Christian scholars were get-go to see a tension betwixt the idea of world-germination and the omnipotence of God; by the showtime of the 3rd century this tension was resolved, world-formation was overcome, and creation ex nihilo had get a fundamental tenet of Christian theology.[107]

See likewise [edit]

  • Adapa
  • Anno Mundi
  • Apollo 8 Genesis reading
  • Atra-hasis epic
  • Allegorical interpretations of Genesis
  • Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament
  • Babylonian mythology
  • Biblical chronology
  • Biblical cosmology
  • Biblical criticism
  • Christian mythology
  • Creation (disambiguation)
  • Creation–evolution controversy
  • Cosmos mandate
  • Cultural mandate
  • Enûma Eliš
  • Genesis flood narrative
  • Hexameron
  • Islamic creation narrative
  • Jewish mythology
  • List of creation myths
  • Mesopotamian mythology
  • Ningishzida
  • Earliest history
  • Faith and mythology
  • Sanamahi creation myth
  • Sumerian creation myth
  • Sumerian literature
  • Tower of Babel
  • Tree of the cognition of good and evil

Notes [edit]

  1. ^ The term myth is used here in its academic sense, meaning "a traditional story consisting of events that are ostensibly historical, though often supernatural, explaining the origins of a cultural practice or natural phenomenon." It is not being used to hateful "something that is false".

Citations [edit]

  1. ^ Leeming & Leeming 2004, p. 113.
  2. ^ a b c Sarna 1997, p. 50.
  3. ^ a b Davies 2007, p. 37.
  4. ^ Bandstra 2008, p. 37.
  5. ^ Wenham 2003b, p. 37.
  6. ^ Alter 2004, p. xii.
  7. ^ a b Waltke 1991, pp. 6–9.
  8. ^ a b Hamilton 1990, pp. 57–58.
  9. ^ Speiser 1964, p. xxi.
  10. ^ Ska 2006, pp. 169, 217–18.
  11. ^ a b Alter 1981, p. 141.
  12. ^ Ruiten 2000, pp. 9–10.
  13. ^ Levenson 2004, p. ix "One aspect of narrative in Genesis that requires special attention is its high tolerance for different versions of the same event, a well-known feature of ancient Most Eastern literature, from primeval times through rabbinic midrash. ... This could not have happened if the existence of variation were seen as a serious defect or if rigid consistency were accounted essential to effective storytelling."
  14. ^ a b Carr 1996, pp. 62–64.
  15. ^ Carr 1996, p. 64.
  16. ^ Cross 1973, pp. 301ff.
  17. ^ Thomas 2011, pp. 27–28.
  18. ^ a b Lambert 1965.
  19. ^ a b Levenson 2004, p. ix.
  20. ^ Leeming 2004.
  21. ^ Smith 2001.
  22. ^ Kutsko 2000, p. 62, quoting J. Maxwell Miller.
  23. ^ McDermott 2002, pp. 25–27.
  24. ^ Marking Smith; Wayne Pitard (2008). The Ugaritic Baal Cycle: Volume II. Introduction with Text, Translation and Commentary of KTU/CAT one.3–one.4. Brill. p. 615. ISBN978-90-474-4232-v.
  25. ^ Van Seters 1992, pp. 122–24.
  26. ^ Carr 1996, p. 242-248.
  27. ^ Dolansky 2016.
  28. ^ Fishbane 2003, pp. 34–35.
  29. ^ Hutton 2007, p. 274.
  30. ^ Levenson 2004, p. thirteen.
  31. ^ a b c Walton 2006, p. 183.
  32. ^ Hyers 1984, p. 74.
  33. ^ Wenham 1987, p. 6.
  34. ^ a b Overn 2017, p. 119.
  35. ^ Genesis 1:1–one:2
  36. ^ Bandstra 2008, pp. 38–39.
  37. ^ Spence 2010, p. 72.
  38. ^ Knight 1990, pp. 175–76.
  39. ^ a b Walton 2001.
  40. ^ Alter 2004, p. 17.
  41. ^ Thompson 1980, p. 230.
  42. ^ Wenham 2003a, p. 29.
  43. ^ Blenkinsopp 2011, pp. 33–34.
  44. ^ Blenkinsopp 2011, pp. 21–22.
  45. ^ Genesis i:3–ane:five
  46. ^ Walton 2003, p. 158.
  47. ^ Bandstra 2008, p. 39.
  48. ^ Genesis 1:6–one:8
  49. ^ Hamilton 1990, p. 122.
  50. ^ Seeley 1991, p. 227.
  51. ^ Walton 2003, pp. 158–59.
  52. ^ Genesis 1:9–i:xiii
  53. ^ Seeley 1997, p. 236.
  54. ^ Bandstra 2008, p. 41.
  55. ^ Kissling 2004, p. 106.
  56. ^ Genesis i:fourteen–1:19
  57. ^ Bandstra 2008, pp. 41–42.
  58. ^ Walsh 2001, p. 37 (fn.v).
  59. ^ Hamilton 1990, p. 127.
  60. ^ Genesis 1:20–1:23
  61. ^ Walton 2003, p. 160.
  62. ^ Genesis 1:24–31
  63. ^ Alter 2004, pp. 18–19, 21.
  64. ^ Kvam et al. 1999, p. 24.
  65. ^ Davidson 1973, p. 24.
  66. ^ Levenson 2004, p. xiv.
  67. ^ Rogerson 1991, pp. 19ff.
  68. ^ Knohl 2003, p. 13.
  69. ^ Genesis 2:1–2:3
  70. ^ Walton 2006, pp. 157–58.
  71. ^ a b Stordalen 2000, pp. 473–74.
  72. ^ Van Seters 1998, p. 22.
  73. ^ Andersen 1987, pp. 137–40.
  74. ^ Change 2004, pp. 20, 22.
  75. ^ Davidson 1973, p. 31.
  76. ^ Levenson 2004, p. 15.
  77. ^ Davidson 1973, p. 29.
  78. ^ Levenson 2004, p. 9 "The story of Adam and Eve's sin in the garden of Eden (2.25–3.24) displays similarities with Gilgamesh, an epic poem that tells how its hero lost the opportunity for immortality and came to terms with his humanity. ... the biblical narrator has adapted the Mesopotamian forerunner to Israelite theology."
  79. ^ Kooij 2010, p. 17.
  80. ^ Propp 1990, p. 193.
  81. ^ Stordalen 2000, pp. 307–x.
  82. ^ Davidson 1973, p. 33.
  83. ^ Change 2004, p. 21.
  84. ^ a b Galambush 2000, p. 436.
  85. ^ Change 2004, p. 22.
  86. ^ Turner 2009, p. 20.
  87. ^ Hastings 2003, p. 607.
  88. ^ Kramer 1963, p. 149.
  89. ^ Jacobs 2007, p. 37.
  90. ^ Hugenberger 1988, p. 184.
  91. ^ Wood 1990, pp. 323–24.
  92. ^ Andersen 1987, p. 142.
  93. ^ Levenson 2004, p. xi.
  94. ^ Hyers 1984, p. 28.
  95. ^ Cotter 2003, pp. 5–ix.
  96. ^ a b Cotter 2003, p. 7.
  97. ^ Cotter 2003, p. 8.
  98. ^ Carr 1996, p. 21."In summary, rather than creating a fully new text after the mode of a modern novelist or even a modern historian, ancient authors of historylike narratives like Gilgamesh or Genesis would often build their text out of earlier traditions. [...] Seen inside this perspective, Genesis is part of a broader spectrum of originally anonymous, history-similar ancient About Eastern narratives."
  99. ^ Seidman 2010, p. 166.
  100. ^ a b Wright 2002, p. 53.
  101. ^ Kaiser 1997, p. 28.
  102. ^ Parrish 1990, pp. 183–84.
  103. ^ a b Aune 2003, p. 119.
  104. ^ Ryken et al 1998, p. 170
  105. ^ Soskice 2010, p. 24.
  106. ^ Nebe 2002, p. 119.
  107. ^ May 2004, p. 179.

References [edit]

  • Alter, Robert (1981). The Art of Biblical narrative. Basic Books. ISBN978-0-465-00427-0.
  • Alter, Robert (2004). The V Books of Moses. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN0-393-33393-0.
  • Andersen, Francis I. (1987). "On Reading Genesis 1–3". In O'Connor, Michael Patrick; Freedman, David Noel (eds.). Backgrounds for the Bible. Eisenbrauns. ISBN978-0-931464-30-0.
  • Aune, David Eastward. (2003). "Cosmology". Westminster Dictionary of the New Testament and Early Christian Literature. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN978-0-664-21917-8.
  • Bandstra, Barry L. (2008). Reading the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible. Wadsworth Publishing Company. p. 576. ISBN978-0-495-39105-0.
  • Blenkinsopp, Joseph (2011). Creation, Un-Creation, Re-Cosmos: A Discursive Commentary on Genesis 1–eleven. T&T Clarke International. ISBN978-0-567-37287-ane.
  • Bouteneff, Peter C. (2008). Beginnings: Aboriginal Christian Readings of the Biblical Creation Narrative. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic. ISBN978-0-8010-3233-2.
  • Brettler, Mark Zvi (2005). How To Read the Bible. Jewish Publication Gild. ISBN978-0-8276-1001-9.
  • Brueggemann, Walter (1982). "Genesis 1:1–2.4". Interpretation of Genesis. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 382. ISBN978-0-8042-3101-five.
  • Carr, David Thousand. (1996). Reading the Fractures in Genesis. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN0-664-22071-1.
  • Carr, David M. (2011). "The Garden of Eden Story". An Introduction to the Old Testament. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN978-1-4443-5623-6.
  • Cotter, David W (2003). Genesis. Liturgical Printing. ISBN978-0-8146-5040-0.
  • Cross, Frank Moore (1973). "The Priestly Work". Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Ballsy: Essays in the History of the Organized religion of Israel. Harvard University Press. p. 394. ISBN0-674-09176-0.
  • Dalley, Stephanie (2000). Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, the Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others. Oxford Academy Press. ISBN978-0-xix-283589-5.
  • Davidson, Robert (1973). Genesis one–11. Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-09760-4.
  • Davies, 1000.I. (2007). "Introduction to the Pentateuch". In Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-927718-6.
  • Dolansky, Shawna (2016). "The Multiple Truths of Myths". Biblical Archaeology Review. 42 (ane): 18, 60.
  • Fishbane, Michael (2003). Biblical Myth and Rabbinic Mythmaking. Oxford Academy Press. ISBN0-19-826733-nine.
  • Friedman, Richard Elliott (2003). The Bible with Sources Revealed. HarperCollins. ISBN978-0-06-195129-9.
  • Galambush, Julie (2000). "Eve". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. ISBN978-9-0535-6503-two.
  • Ginzberg, Louis (1909). The Legends of the Jews (PDF). Jewish Publication Society. p. 695.
  • Graves, Robert; Patai, Raphael (1986). Hebrew Myths: The Book of Genesis. Random Firm. ISBN978-0-7953-3715-4.
  • Hamilton, Victor P (1990). The Book of Genesis: Chapters one–17. New International Commentary on the Erstwhile Testament (NICOT). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 540. ISBN0-8028-2521-4.
  • Hastings, James (2003). Encyclopedia of Faith and Ideals, Part 10. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN978-0-7661-3682-iii.
  • Heidel, Alexander (1963). Babylonian Genesis (2nd ed.). Chicago Academy Press. ISBN0-226-32399-4.
  • Heidel, Alexander (1963). The Gilgamesh Epic and Quondam Testament Parallels (2d Revised ed.). Chicago Academy Press. ISBN0-226-32398-6.
  • Hugenberger, G.P. (1988). "Rib". In Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (ed.). The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Volume 4. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0-8028-3784-4.
  • Hutton, Jeremy (2007). "Isaiah 51:9–xi and the Rhetorical Appropriation and Subversion of Hostile Theologies". Periodical of Biblical Literature. Society of Biblical Literature. 126 (two): 271–303. doi:ten.2307/27638435. JSTOR 27638435.
  • Hyers, Conrad (1984). The Meaning of Creation: Genesis and Modern Science. Westminster John Knox. ISBN978-0-8042-0125-four.
  • Jacobs, Mignon R (2007). Gender, Power, and Persuasion: The Genesis Narratives and Contemporary Perspectives. Bakery Academic. ISBN978-0-8010-2706-two.
  • Janzen, David (2004). The Social Meanings of Sacrifice in the Hebrew Bible: A Study of Iv Writings. Walter de Gruyter Publisher. ISBN978-3-11-018158-6.
  • Kaiser, Christopher B. (1997). Creational Theology and the History of Physical Science. Brill. ISBN90-04-10669-iii.
  • Kaplan, Aryeh (2002). "Hashem/Elokim: Mixing Mercy with Justice". The Aryeh Kaplan Reader: The Souvenir He Left Behind. Mesorah Publication, Ltd. p. 224. ISBN0-89906-173-7 . Retrieved 29 December 2010.
  • Keel, Othmar (1997). The Symbolism of the Biblical World. Eisenbrauns. ISBN978-one-57506-014-9.
  • King, Leonard (2010). Enuma Elish: The Seven Tablets of Cosmos; The Babylonian and Assyrian Legends Concerning the Creation of the World and of Mankind. Cosimo Inc.
  • Kissling, Paul (2004). Genesis, Book ane. College Printing. ISBN978-0-89900-875-2.
  • Knight, Douglas A (1990). "Cosmology". In Watson E. Mills (ed.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN978-0-86554-373-7.
  • Knohl, State of israel (2003). The Divine Symphony: The Bible'south Many Voices. Jewish Publication Society. ISBN978-0-8276-1018-7.
  • Kooij, Arie van der (2010). "The Story of Paradise in the Calorie-free of Mesopotamian Culture and Literature". In Dell, Katherine J; Davies, Graham; Koh, Yee Von (eds.). Genesis, Isaiah, and Psalms. Brill. ISBN978-90-04-18231-8.
  • Kramer, Samuel Noah (1956). History Begins at Sumer: 30-Nine Firsts in Recorded History.
  • Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Civilisation, and Character . University of Chicago Press. ISBN0-226-45238-7.
  • Kugler, Robert; Hartin, Patrick (2009). An Introduction to the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0-8028-4636-5.
  • Kutsko, John F. (2000). Betwixt Heaven and Globe: Divine Presence and Absenteeism in the Book of Ezekiel. Eisenbrauns. ISBN978-1-57506-041-5.
  • Kvam, Kristen E.; Schearing, Linda Due south.; Ziegler, Valarie H., eds. (1999). Eve and Adam: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Readings on Genesis and Gender. Indiana University Press. p. 515. ISBN0-253-21271-5.
  • Lambert, Due west. G. (1965). "A New Wait at the Babylonian Groundwork of Genesis". The Journal of Theological Studies. Vol. 16, no. 2. pp. 287–300. JSTOR 23959032.
  • Leeming, David A. (2010). Creation Myths of the Earth: An Encyclopedia. Vol. i. ABC-CLIO. ISBN978-ane-59884-174-9.
  • Leeming, David A. (2004). "Biblical cosmos". The Oxford Companion to Earth Mythology. Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-515669-0 . Retrieved 5 May 2010.
  • Leeming, David A.; Leeming, Margaret (2004). A Dictionary of Creation Myths. Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-510275-eight.
  • Levenson, Jon D. (2004). "Genesis: Introduction and Annotations". In Berlin, Adele; Brettler, Marc Zvi (eds.). The Jewish study Bible . Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-529751-5.
  • Louth, Andrew (2001). "Introduction". In Andrew Louth (ed.). Genesis 1–11. InterVarsity Press. ISBN978-0-8308-1471-8.
  • May, Gerhard (2004). Creatio Ex Nihilo (English trans. of 1994 ed.). T&T Clarke International. ISBN978-0-567-08356-two.
  • McDermott, John J. (2002). Reading the Pentateuch: A Historical Introduction. Paulist Press. ISBN978-0-8091-4082-4.
  • McMullin, Ernin (2010). "Cosmos Ex Nihilo: Early on History". In Burrell, David B.; Cogliati, Carlo; Soskice, Janet M.; Stoeger, William R. (eds.). Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge: Cambridge Academy Press. ISBN978-1-139-49078-8.
  • Nebe, Gottfried (2002). "Cosmos in Paul's Theology". In Hoffman, Yair; Reventlow, Henning Graf (eds.). Creation in Jewish and Christian Tradition. Sheffield Academic Press. ISBN978-0-567-57393-3.
  • Overn, William (March 2017). "Review: Repetition in the Bible" (PDF). Lutheran Synod Quarterly. 57 (1).
  • Parrish, V. Steven (1990). "Creation". In Watson Due east. Mills (ed.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Printing. ISBN978-0-86554-373-7.
  • Penchansky, David (November 2005). Twilight of the Gods: Polytheism in the Hebrew Bible. U.South.: Westminster/John Knox Press. ISBN0-664-22885-2.
  • Propp, W.H. (1990). "Eden Sketches". In Propp, W.H.; Halpern, Baruch; Freedman, D.Due north. (eds.). The Hebrew Bible and its Interpreters. Eisenbrauns. ISBN978-0-931464-52-2.
  • Ruiten, Jacques T. A. G. M. (2000). Primaeval History Interpreted. Brill. ISBN90-04-11658-3.
  • Rogerson, John William (1991). Genesis 1–11. T&T Clark. ISBN978-0-567-08338-8.
  • Sarna, Nahum M. (1997). "The Mists of Time: Genesis I–Two". In Feyerick, Ada (ed.). Genesis: Earth of Myths and Patriarchs. New York: NYU Press. p. 560. ISBN0-8147-2668-2.
  • Ryken, Leland; Wilhoit, Jim; Longman, Tremper; Duriez, Colin; Penney, Douglas; Reid, Daniel G., eds. (1998). "Cosmology". Dictionary of Biblical Imagery. InterVarsity Printing. ISBN978-0-8308-6733-ii.
  • Sawyer, John F.A. (1992). "The Epitome of God, the Wisdom of Serpents, and the Knowledge of Skillful and Evil". In Paul Morris, Deborah Sawyer (ed.). A Walk in the Garden: Biblical, Iconographical and Literary Images of Eden. Sheffield Academic Press Press. ISBN978-0-567-02447-iii.
  • Schwartz, Howard; Loebel-Fried, Caren; Ginsburg, Elliot Thousand. (2007). Tree of Souls: The Mythology of Judaism. Oxford Academy Press. p. 704. ISBN978-0-19-535870-4.
  • Seidman, Naomi (2010). "Translation". In Ronald Hendel (ed.). Reading Genesis: Ten Methods. Cambridge Academy Press. ISBN978-0-521-51861-ane.
  • Seeley, Paul H. (1991). "The Firmament and the Water In a higher place: The Pregnant of Raqia in Genesis 1:6–eight" (PDF). Westminster Theological Journal. Westminster Theological Seminary. 53: 227–40. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2009. Retrieved 11 Dec 2007.
  • Seeley, Paul H. (1997). "The Geographical Meaning of 'Earth' and 'Seas' in Genesis ane:10" (PDF). Westminster Theological Periodical. Westminster Theological Seminary. 59: 231–55. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 Oct 2020. Retrieved xi December 2007.
  • Ska, Jean-Louis (2006). Introduction to Reading the Pentateuch. Eisenbrauns. ISBN978-1-57506-122-1.
  • Smith, Mark S. (Oct 2002). The Early on History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel (2nd ed.). William B Eerdmans Publishing Co. ISBN0-8028-3972-X.
  • Smith, Marker South. (Nov 2001). The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel'south Polytheistic Groundwork and the Ugaritic Texts (New ed.). Oxford University Press U.s.a.. ISBN0-19-516768-6.
  • Soskice, Janet Thou. (2010). "Creatio ex nihilo: its Jewish and Christian foundations". In Burrell, David B.; Cogliati, Carlo; Soskice, Janet Thou.; Stoeger, William R. (eds.). Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge Academy Press. ISBN978-1-139-49078-viii.
  • Speiser, Ephraim Avigdor (1964). Genesis . Doubleday.
  • Spence, Lewis (2010) [1916]. Myths and Legends of Babylonia and Assyria. Cosimo, Inc. p. 72. ISBN978-1-61640-464-2.
  • Stenhouse, John (2000). "Genesis and Science". In Gary B. Ferngren (ed.). The History of Science and Religion in the Western Tradition: An Encyclopedia. New York, London: Garland Publishing, Inc. p. 76. ISBN0-8153-1656-ix.
  • Stagg, Evelyn and Frank (1978). "Genesis and Scientific discipline". Woman in the World of Jesus. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Westminster Press. p. 135. ISBN0-664-24195-6.
  • Stordalen, Terje (2000). Echoes of Eden. Peeters. ISBN978-xc-429-0854-3.
  • Thomas, Matthew A. (2011). These Are the Generations: Identity, Covenant and the Toledot Formula. T&T Clark (Continuum). ISBN978-0-567-48764-3.
  • Thompson, J. A. (1980). Jeremiah . New International Commentary on the Sometime Testament (2nd ed.). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 831. ISBN0-8028-2530-three. J.A Thompson Jeremiah.
  • Tsumura, David Toshio (2005). Cosmos And Destruction: A Reappraisal of the Chaoskampf Theory in the Old Testament. Eisenbrauns. ISBN978-1-57506-106-1.
  • Turner, Laurence A. (2009). Genesis. Sheffield Phoenix Press. ISBN978-1-906055-65-3.
  • Van Seters, John (1998). "The Pentateuch". In McKenzie, Steven L.; Graham, Grand. Patrick (eds.). The Hebrew Bible Today: An Introduction to Critical Bug. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN978-0-664-25652-4.
  • Van Seters, John (1992). Prologue to History: The Yahwist Equally Historian in Genesis. New International Commentary on the Quondam Testament. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN0-664-22179-3.
  • Walsh, Jerome T. (2001). Style and Structure in Biblical Hebrew Narrative. Liturgical Press. ISBN978-0-8146-5897-0.
  • Waltke, Bruce (1991). "The Literary Genre of Genesis, Chapter One" (PDF). Crux. Westminster Theological Seminary. 27:iv. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 April 2014.
  • Walton, John H. (2006). Ancient Most Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible. Baker Academic. ISBN0-8010-2750-0.
  • Walton, John H. (2003). "Cosmos". In T. Desmond Alexander, David Weston Baker (ed.). Dictionary of the Quondam Attestation: Pentateuch. InterVarsity Press. ISBN978-0-8308-1781-8.
  • Walton, John H. (2001). Genesis. Zondervan. ISBN978-0-310-86620-6.
  • Walton, John H.; Matthews, Victor H.; Chavalas, Mark W. (2000). "Genesis". The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Former Testament. InterVarsity Press. ISBN978-0-8308-1419-0.
  • Wenham, Gordon (2003a). Exploring the Old Attestation: A Guide to the Pentateuch. Exploring the Bible Series. Vol. one. IVP Bookish. p. 223.
  • Wenham, Gordon (2003b). "Genesis". In Dunn, James Douglas Grant; Rogerson, J. John William (eds.). Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0-8028-3711-0.
  • Wenham, Gordon (1987). Genesis i–15. Vol. 1 and two. Texas: Give-and-take Books. ISBN0-8499-0200-ii.
  • Whybray, R.N (2001). "Genesis". In John Barton (ed.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-xix-875500-5.
  • Forest, Ralpth C (1990). "Genre, Concept of". In Watson E. Mills (ed.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN978-0-86554-373-7.
  • Wright, J. Edward (2002). The Early History of Heaven. Oxford University Printing. ISBN978-0-xix-534849-1.
  • Wylen, Stephen G. (2005). "Affiliate half dozen Midrash". The Seventy Faces of Torah: The Jewish way of Reading the Sacred Scriptures. Paulist Press. p. 256. ISBN0-8091-4179-5.

External links [edit]

Biblical texts [edit]

  • Chapter i Affiliate 2 (Hebrew-English text, translated co-ordinate to the JPS 1917 Edition)
  • Affiliate 1 Affiliate 2 Chapter three (Hebrew–English language text, with Rashi's commentary. The translation is the authoritative Judaica Press version, edited by Rabbi A.J. Rosenberg.)
  • Affiliate 1 Chapter 2 (New American Bible)
  • Chapter one Chapter 2 (King James Version)
  • Chapter 1 Chapter 2 (Revised Standard Version)
  • Chapter 1 Chapter 2 (New Living Translation)
  • Chapter 1 Chapter 2 (New American Standard Bible)
  • Chapter 1 Chapter 2 (New International Version (United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland))

Mesopotamian texts [edit]

  • "Enuma Elish", at Encyclopedia of the Orient Summary of Enuma Elish with links to full text.
  • ETCSL – Text and translation of the Eridu Genesis (alternating site) (The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature, Oxford)
  • "Epic of Gilgamesh" (summary)
  • British Museum: Cuneiform tablet from Sippar with the story of Atra-Hasis

[edit]

  • Homo Timeline (Interactive) – Smithsonian, National Museum of Natural History (August 2016).

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_creation_narrative

Posted by: jacobsthadet.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Are Elements Of Creation In Genesis That Changed Aftet The Fall"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel